T cell regulation: a special job or everyone's responsibility?

B Stockinger, T Barthlott, G Kassiotis - nature immunology, 2001 - nature.com
B Stockinger, T Barthlott, G Kassiotis
nature immunology, 2001nature.com
CORRESPONDENCE chemokines. We propose that there are at least two ways to arrive at
immune regulation. One possibility is that the action of cells in their effector phase
(CD45RBloCD25+CTLA-4+), irrespective of TCR specificity, might curtail the expansion
potential of any naïve cell with possible autoreactive function via competition for IL-2 and
access to antigen-presenting cells. Alternatively, IL-7–driven homeostatic expansion of high-
avidity naïve cells in a lymphopenic environment, followed by at least partial activation …
CORRESPONDENCE chemokines. We propose that there are at least two ways to arrive at immune regulation. One possibility is that the action of cells in their effector phase (CD45RBloCD25+CTLA-4+), irrespective of TCR specificity, might curtail the expansion potential of any naïve cell with possible autoreactive function via competition for IL-2 and access to antigen-presenting cells. Alternatively, IL-7–driven homeostatic expansion of high-avidity naïve cells in a lymphopenic environment, followed by at least partial activation, could out-compete the expansion of other naïve T cells. As long as the competing naïve population does not consist of autoreactive cells, they might provide protection against pathological immune responses or autoimmunity.
nature.com